No Result
View All Result
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
Monday, September 21, 2026
Article 15 of Constitution of India
28 °c
New Delhi
33 ° Tue
33 ° Wed
  • MINORITIES
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HINDUTVA
  • HATE CRIMES
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MORE
    • INTERVIEWS
    • BOOKS
    • MISC
  • MINORITIES
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HINDUTVA
  • HATE CRIMES
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MORE
    • INTERVIEWS
    • BOOKS
    • MISC
No Result
View All Result
Article 15 of Constitution of India
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC
Home MINORITIES

Allahabad HC Frees Two Women Held by Father for Five Years After Conversion to Islam, Imposes ₹25 Lakh Penalty

Representing the women, Advocates Syed Kaif Hasan and Kunwar Sultan Ali argued that the petitioners had been illegally deprived of their freedom despite being adults fully capable of making independent decisions.

by article15
August 6, 2026
in MINORITIES
0 0
A A
0
Allahabad HC Frees Two Women Held by Father for Five Years After Conversion to Islam, Imposes ₹25 Lakh Penalty
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsApp

Prayagraj: In a significant affirmation of constitutional freedoms, the Allahabad High Court has ordered the immediate release of two adult women who were allegedly confined by their parents for nearly five years after renouncing Hinduism and embracing Islam, ruling that no family can deprive an adult of liberty because of their religious beliefs.

Justice Sandeep Jain, hearing a habeas corpus petition, held that the prolonged confinement of the women was unlawful and directed that they be released immediately. The court also imposed ₹25 lakh in compensation, to be jointly paid by the parents and the Uttar Pradesh government, and instructed the police not to interfere with the women’s lives or personal choices.

The case concerned two adult women who, according to the petition, had been held against their will by their family for almost five years after converting to Islam. The High Court placed their constitutional rights to personal liberty, freedom of conscience, and freedom of religion at the centre of its ruling, observing that these rights cannot be curtailed merely because their family disapproves of their decision.

During the previous hearing on July 31, the court had directed that both women be produced befordf ,./ remarking that “voluntary conversion to Islam and marriage by adult women are protected by constitutional rights, and no one, including their father, can interfere if there is no coercion or deception.”

Representing the women, Advocates Syed Kaif Hasan and Kunwar Sultan Ali argued that the petitioners had been illegally deprived of their freedom despite being adults fully capable of making independent decisions.

Speaking after the judgment, Hasan said the ruling reaffirmed that an adult woman’s liberty cannot be made conditional upon her family’s approval of her religious choices. He described the decision as a significant recognition of the constitutional protections available to adults whose personal choices are opposed by their families.

The court further directed the police not to interfere with the women’s future decisions, reinforcing their right to live according to their own beliefs and choices without state or familial interference.

The judgment draws upon a long line of Supreme Court and High Court precedents recognising that Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, includes an individual’s freedom to choose their faith, partner and way of life.

The Allahabad High Court has previously held that the right to live with a person of one’s choice, irrespective of religion, is intrinsic to the right to life and personal liberty. In a landmark 2020 ruling, the court observed that the freedom of consenting adults to make decisions regarding marriage and religion is constitutionally protected and cannot be overridden by family or societal pressure.

The latest ruling reinforces that principle, underscoring that constitutional courts have a duty to protect the autonomy and liberty of adults from unlawful confinement, even when such detention is carried out by members of their own family.

Tags: high courtpolicewomen
ShareTweetSend
Previous Post

“‘Not a Public Conspiracy’: Zia-ur-Rahman Challenges Judicial Commission’s Sambhal Violence Findings”

Next Post

“What If I Am a Muslim?”: Bengali Theatre Artist Alleges Assault by Hindutva Men Over Identity

Next Post
“What If I Am a Muslim?”: Bengali Theatre Artist Alleges Assault by Hindutva Men Over Identity

"What If I Am a Muslim?": Bengali Theatre Artist Alleges Assault by Hindutva Men Over Identity

Recent Posts

  • Who Should Pay When Climate Change Hits the Vulnerable?
  • India’s Student Mental Health Crisis: Why Prevention Must Become a National Priority 
  • Allahabad HC Orders ₹4.75 Lakh Compensation, Quashes Illegal Vehicle Seizure Under UP Cow Slaughter Law
  • Muslim Woman Alleges Name-Based Profiling at Rahul Gandhi’s Presser; Another Says She Was Abused After Being Mistaken for Muslim
  • “What If I Am a Muslim?”: Bengali Theatre Artist Alleges Assault by Hindutva Men Over Identity

Recommended

Kumbh Mela 25

Sacrificing the Spirit of the Kumbh Mela at the Altar of a Divisive Agenda

2 years ago
Nishaanchi: The Badly Missed Target

Nishaanchi: The Badly Missed Target

11 months ago

Popular Posts

  • Prominent Academics and Activists Call for Education Minister’s Resignation to End Sonam Wangchuk’s Hunger Strike

    Prominent Academics and Activists Call for Education Minister’s Resignation to End Sonam Wangchuk’s Hunger Strike

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Bill Proposing Up to 3 Years’ Jail for Insulting or Disrupting ‘Vande Mataram’ to Be Introduced in Rajya Sabha

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Amit Shah Assesses Bengal’s Law and Order in Meeting with State Officials

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Junaid-Nasir Murder Accused Monu Manesar Shares Photo with President’s Police Medal-Winning IPS Officer Rajesh Duggal

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • APCR Secures Acquittal for Gulfam and Shoaib in IB Officer Ankit Sharma Murder Case Linked to the 2020 Delhi Riots

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Article 15 of Constitution of India

We strive to document discrimination and religiously motivated atrocities against minorities, working to uphold their constitutional rights and contribute to building a more just and inclusive India for everyone.

Categories

  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS

Categories

  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC

Links

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CONTACT US

© 2024 Article15

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC

© 2024 Article15

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?