No Result
View All Result
  • ABOUT US
  • CONTACT US
Sunday, August 17, 2025
Article 15 of Constitution of India
28 °c
New Delhi
31 ° Mon
32 ° Tue
  • MINORITIES
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HINDUTVA
  • HATE CRIMES
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MORE
    • INTERVIEWS
    • BOOKS
    • MISC
  • MINORITIES
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HINDUTVA
  • HATE CRIMES
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MORE
    • INTERVIEWS
    • BOOKS
    • MISC
No Result
View All Result
Article 15 of Constitution of India
No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC
Advertise with us Advertise with us Advertise with us
Home DISCRIMINATION

SIR in Bihar: SC lawyer Ashwani Upadhyay Demands Revocation of Citizenship for 65 Lakh Alleged ‘Fake Voters’

by article15
August 5, 2025
in DISCRIMINATION, HATE CRIMES, ISLAMOPHOBIA
0 0
A A
0
Supreme Court's lawyer Ashwani Upadhyay

Supreme Court's lawyer Ashwani Upadhyay

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on WhatsApp

Supreme Court lawyer and BJP leader Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay has filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court seeking the removal of nearly 65 lakh alleged fake voters from the electoral rolls and revocation of their citizenship.

https://article15.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/VID-20250804-WA0445.mp4

Upadhyay is seeking a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls nationwide before every Parliamentary, Assembly, and local body election.

Upadhyay alleges that foreign infiltrators have been fraudulently enrolled as voters in multiple states, altering electoral demographics in over 200 districts and 1,500 tehsils. His plea claims that illegal infiltration, religious conversions, and migration are politically exploited to distort election outcomes.

The petition states, “Demography is destiny, It is the constitutional duty of the Centre, States, and ECI to ensure that only genuine citizens vote, not foreigners.”

The petition argues that routine annual revisions under Section 14(1) of the Representation of the People Act are inadequate, urging the court to interpret Section 21(3) to allow special revisions in “extraordinary circumstances.” It warns of “Pakistani, Afghan, Bangladeshi, and Rohingya infiltrators” whose presence could dilute legitimate votes and undermine faith in elections.

Upadhyay alleges that infiltration is coordinated by syndicates providing forged documents, political protection, and illegal settlement, calling it a “transnational conspiracy” that threatens national security.

The matter was mentioned before a Bench of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, who asked Upadhyay to cure procedural defects before further listing.

Notably, TMC MP Mahua Moitra and others have also challenged the ECI’s June 24, 2025 order initiating a similar SIR in Bihar, arguing it could lead to large-scale disenfranchisement of genuine voters, especially from marginalised groups.

Upadhyay urged the court to direct the Election Commission of India to conduct a Special Intensive Revision of voter lists before every general, assembly, and municipal election. He alleged that forged Aadhaar cards, ration cards, and voter IDs were enabling fraudulent registrations, threatening the integrity of the electoral process.

The plea invokes Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, and seeks strict verification measures as well as action against networks accused of manufacturing fake documents.

Upadhyay, known for filing frequent PILs, has often courted controversy for remarks against Muslims. In 2021, he was arrested after anti-Muslim slogans were raised during a protest he organised at Jantar Mantar. Civil rights groups have filed multiple complaints against him for speeches in Maharashtra and Rajasthan in 2023 and 2024, accusing him of spreading conspiracy theories like “love jihad” and “population jihad.”

Monitoring groups such as Citizens for Justice and Peace and Hindutva Watch have documented several of his speeches in which he described Muslim-majority areas and institutions such as madrasas as threats to national integrity. On his Facebook account, he has made several similar controversial remarks targeting Muslims. The Supreme Court has also cautioned him during hearings on his PILs, directing that defamatory content targeting minorities be removed.

The current petition is expected to be heard by the Supreme Court in the coming weeks.

Tags: Ashwani UpadhyayHate Speech
ShareTweetSend
Advertise with us Advertise with us Advertise with us
Previous Post

Understanding the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), NRC and NPR: Addressing Widespread Fears Among Indian Muslims

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • SIR in Bihar: SC lawyer Ashwani Upadhyay Demands Revocation of Citizenship for 65 Lakh Alleged ‘Fake Voters’
  • Understanding the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), NRC and NPR: Addressing Widespread Fears Among Indian Muslims
  • Anti-National and Anti-Hindu RSS: Documentary Evidence from its Archives 
  • Sharjeel Imam Writes from Jail: On Jinnah, Islamic Modernism, Democracy, and Muslim Exclusion
  • The Road Less Travelled at Jim Corbett: Meeting a Supreme Court Judge
Advertise with us Advertise with us Advertise with us

Recommended

Muslim man beaten, paraded over alleged molestation in Uttarakhand’s Rishikesh

Muslim man beaten, paraded over alleged molestation in Uttarakhand’s Rishikesh

9 months ago
Why AI Will Enhance, Not Replace, Human Diplomacy

Why AI Will Enhance, Not Replace, Human Diplomacy

3 months ago

Popular Posts

  • Diljit Dosanjh takes a jibe at Hindutva ideology with Rahat Indori’s poetry

    Diljit Dosanjh takes a jibe at Hindutva ideology with Rahat Indori’s poetry

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Muslim youths beaten by mob, forced to chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’ in Maharashtra’s Bhiwandi

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • There was not a Hindu temple underneath the Babri masjid: Justice RF Nariman

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Reaffirming the Hindu Rashtra Agenda: RSS chief sets the course for BJP politics

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Uttarakhand : Hindutva forces seek to drive Muslims out of ‘holy land’

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Article 15 of Constitution of India

We strive to document discrimination and religiously motivated atrocities against minorities, working to uphold their constitutional rights and contribute to building a more just and inclusive India for everyone.

Categories

  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS

Categories

  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC

Links

  • HOME
  • ABOUT US
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • CONTACT US

© 2024 Article15

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • HOME
  • BOOKS
  • DISCRIMINATION
  • HATE CRIMES
  • HINDUTVA
  • HUMAN RIGHTS
  • INTERVIEWS
  • ISLAMOPHOBIA
  • JUDICIARY
  • MEDIA WATCH
  • MINORITIES
  • MISC

© 2024 Article15

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?